Integration of socioecological systems in the redesign of sustainable industrial processes in La Venta, Tabasco
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61117/ipsumtec.v9i1.446Keywords:
Circular economy, Sustainable process engineering, Green infrastructure, Industrial symbiosis, Socio-ecological systems, Socio-techno-ecological transitionsAbstract
The region of La Venta, Tabasco, faces environmental and socioeconomic challenges caused by industrial pressure, water vulnerability, and ecosystem degradation. In this regard, the integration of socio-ecological systems (SES) into the redesign of industrial processes emerges as a strategy for advancing toward sustainability. This article aims to analyze, from a documentary and qualitative perspective, the conceptual frameworks and most recent studies related to industrial sustainability, with the purpose of identifying strategies applicable to the local and regional context, focusing on populations with similar characteristics. A literature review was conducted based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses) method, considering articles indexed in Scopus and Web of Science published between 2020 and 2025. Ten studies with information relevant to the research were selected, including information on socio-ecological systems, industrial symbiosis, circular economy, and socio-techno-ecological transitions. A thematic-qualitative analysis was used to synthesize contributions, barriers, and elements transferable to the redesign of sustainable industrial processes in La Venta. The study shows that the integration of SES requires coordination between technological infrastructure, ecosystem services, and community integration. The articles reviewed highlight strategies such as tracking material and energy flows, adopting local industrial synergies, using green infrastructure for water management, and implementing multi-actor governance models. The most common barriers include institutional fragmentation, lack of local data, limited economic incentives, and limited collaboration between industry, government, and society. Sustainable redesign in La Venta must be based on socio-techno-ecological approaches that foster technological innovation, strengthen local capacities, and preserve ecosystems, promoting fair and collaborative transitions.
Downloads
Metrics
References
T. Haer, W. J. W. Botzen, J. Zavala-Hidalgo, C. Cusell y P. J. Ward, “Economic evaluation of climate risk adaptation strategies: Cost-benefit analysis of flood protection in Tabasco, Mexico,” Atmósfera, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 101–120, 2017, doi: 10.20937/ATM.2017.30.02.03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20937/ATM.2017.30.02.03
Zurich Flood Resilience Alliance, “Executive summary: Learning from the 2020 floods in Tabasco, Mexico,” Post-Event Review Capability (PERC), Zurich, Switzerland, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://preparecenter.org/resource/executive-summary-learning-from-the-2020-floods-in-tabasco-mexico/
E. Ostrom, “A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems,” Science, vol. 325, no. 5939, pp. 419–422, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1126/science.1172133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
I. Souliotis and N. N. Voulvoulis, “Sustainability transitions: The role of systems thinking in improving planetary health and human prosperity,” Frontiers in Environmental Science, vol. 13, Art. no. 1730692, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1730692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1730692
M. R. Chertow, “Industrial symbiosis: literature and taxonomy,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, vol. 25, pp. 313–337, Nov. 2000, doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.313
A. A. Feil, D. Schreiber, C. Haetinger, V. J. Strasburg y C. L. Barkert, “Sustainability indicators for industrial organizations: Systematic review of literature,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 3, art. no. 854, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11030854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030854
J. Carreño-Ortiz, M. Escobar-Sierra, and F. Lopez-Perez, “Theoretical relationship between circular economy and social innovation from a sustainable development perspective,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 12, Art. no. 1549, 2025, doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-05862-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05862-0
J. Andersson, T. T. Lennerfors, and H. Fornstedt, “Towards a socio-techno-ecological approach to sustainability transitions,” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, vol. 51, Art. no. 100846, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2024.100846. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2024.100846
R. Geetha, “Circular economy through integrated industrial ecology: Innovations in resource recovery and process re-design,” Biotechnology Notes, vol. 6, pp. 245–259, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.biotno.2025.10.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotno.2025.10.005
T. Burström, T. Lahti, V. Parida, and J. Wincent, “Industrial ecosystems: A systematic review, framework and research agenda,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 208, p. 123656, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123656
M. Mirata, A. Lindfors, and M. L. Kambanou, “A business value framework for industrial symbiosis,” Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1541–1553, 2024, doi: 10.1111/jiec.13545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13545
S. Upadhayay et al., “Development in the circular economy concept,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 1500, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16041500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041500
S. Khromova et al., “A social-ecological-technological vulnerability approach for assessing urban hydrological risks,” Ecological Indicators, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4975056
M. Hossain et al., “Exploring the barriers to implement industrial symbiosis,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 13, Art. no. e34156, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34156
A. Manyani, R. Biggs, L. Hill, and R. Preiser, “The evolution of social-ecological systems research,” Ecology and Society, vol. 29, no. 1, p. 33, 2024, doi: 10.5751/ES-14694-290133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-14694-290133
M. A. Sellitto et al., “Exploring industrial symbiotic networks,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 4, p. 1509, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17041509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041509
M. Ferrante, M. Vitti, and C. Sassanelli, “The evolution of circular economy performance assessment,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115757
M. J. Page, J. E. McKenzie, P. M. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T. C. Hoffmann, C. D. Mulrow, L. Shamseer, J. Tetzlaff, E. A. Akl, R. Brennan, B. Chou, E. Glanville, E. Grimshaw, A. Hróbjartsson, A. Lalu, T. Li, A. Loder, Q. Mayo-Wilson, A. McDonald, J. A. McGuinness, D. Moher, L. R. Stewart, y J. M. Welch, “The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” BMJ, vol. 372, p. n71, 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías, “Los Programas Nacionales Estratégicos (PRONACES),” Gobierno de México, s.f. [Online]. Available:https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/448752/Programas_Nacionales_Estrat_gicos.pdf
United Nations General Assembly, “Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” Resolution A/RES/70/1, 2015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jesus Adrian Altamirano Acosta, Pascual Jiménez Palma , Keila Contreras Bazurto , Lorena del Jesus Sarao Cruz , Nely Nayeli Arias Santos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
