Determinar el grado de frustración en función de las etapas de un ensamble

Selene Portillo Méndez; Jorge de la Riva Rodríguez; Ana Isela García Acosta; Rosa María Reyes Martínez

doi:10.61117/ipsumtec.v6i3.203

Authors

Selene Portillo Méndez Tecnológico Nacional de México https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1493-2477
Jorge de la Riva Rodríguez Tecnológico Nacional de México https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8402-0065
Ana Isela García Acosta Tecnológico Nacional de México https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4394-3941
Rosa María Reyes Martínez Tecnológico Nacional de México https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4950-5045

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61117/ipsumtec.v6i3.203

Keywords:

Assembly line balancing, Frustration, Motivation, Optimization

Abstract

An experiment was carried out to verify in an assembly line, how it affects motivation or frustration, in the location of a workstation as the product progresses in it. The results obtained from the research carried out by the Technological Institute of Ciudad Juárez developed in the ergonomics laboratory are presented. The product consisted of a set of Legos, which was divided into four workstations. A total factorial design was used to carry out the experiment of 4 operators, recording their execution time and using the NASA TLX questionnaire in its digital version, the degree of frustration were measured. Same as being analyzed and performing a statistical analysis with an Anova test, allowed us to conclude that there is no difference in motivation or frustration in an operator that is directly related to the stage of the group that he performs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Boysen, Schulze & Scholl (2022), Assembly line balancing: What happened in the last fifteen years? European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 301, Issue 3, pp 797-814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.11.043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.11.043

Kaku, Murase & Yin. (2008), A study on human-task-related performances in converting conveyor assembly line to cellular manufacturing. European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Vol. 2 No.1, pp 17-34 https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIE.2008.016327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIE.2008.016327

Boysen, Fliedner & Scholl (2008), Assembly line balancing: Which model to use when? International Journal of Production Economics, Volume 111, Issue 2, pp 509-528 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.02.026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.02.026

Cuyubamba, J. (2014). Ergonomía y productividad, p 48. volumen 2, journal Industrial Data https://doi.org/10.15381/idata.v2i1.6474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15381/idata.v2i1.6474

NASA TLX Task Load Index, Recuperado de; https://humansystems.arc.nasa.gov/groups/tlx/tlxapp.php

Nagamachi, Mitsuo, (2002), Relationships among job design, macroergonomics and productivity, Macroergonomics: Theory, Methods, and Applications pp111-131. Recuperado de: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329544026_Relationships_among_job_design_macroergonomics_and_productivity/citation/download DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b12477-7

Simancas R., Silvera A., Garcés L. & Gaspar H., (2018) Administración de recursos humanos: factor estratégico de productividad empresarial en pymes de Barranquilla, Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, vol. 23, núm. 82, pp. 377-391, 2018, Universidad del Zulia. Recuperado de: https://www.redalyc.org/journal/290/29056115008/html/

De la Riva, J. (2018). Diseño del trabajo. Tecnológico nacional de México/ Instituto tecnológico de Cd. Juárez. Ciudad Juárez, capitulo 12, México.

Sharek, D. (2011). A Usable, Online NASA-TLX Tool. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 55(1), 1375–1379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181311551286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181311551286

Arana, N. (2020). Determinación y programación de Pausas en el manejo de la carga mental para procesos de producción sustentables. (Tesis de Doctorado, Instituto Tecnológico de Ciudad Juárez.