Diseño de circuitos integrados de uso dedicado (ASIC) mediante tarjetas de desarrollo (FPGA): Propuesta de investigación

Jeovany Rafael Rodríguez Mejía; Manuel Alejandro Barajas-Bustillos; German Quiroz Merino; Arturo Woocay Prieto; Mario Macario Ruiz Grijalva

doi:10.61117/ipsumtec.v7i3.342

Autores/as

Jeovany Rafael Rodríguez Mejía Tecnológico Nacional de México https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4154-0778
Manuel Alejandro Barajas-Bustillos Tecnológico Nacional de México https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1155-1847
German Quiroz Merino Tecnológico Nacional de México https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5303-8243
Arturo Woocay Prieto Tecnológico Nacional de México https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9235-0494
Mario Macario Ruiz Grijalva Tecnológico Nacional de México https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8912-2535

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61117/ipsumtec.v7i3.342

Palabras clave:

FPGA, ASIC, Laboratorio Remoto, Semiconductores

Resumen

El proceso educativo ha experimentado una transformación significativa con la digitalización y el avance de las tecnologías de información y comunicación, impulsado principalmente por el internet. Este cambio ha motivado al sistema educativo a crear herramientas didácticas alternativas que aprovechen estas tecnologías para enriquecer la enseñanza. Las tecnologías inmersivas y los laboratorios remotos, ya sea combinados o por separado, han demostrado ser efectivos para aumentar el interés y la motivación de los estudiantes en la adquisición de conocimientos avanzados. Se sugiere desarrollar una infraestructura de laboratorio remoto con tecnologías inmersivas para que los estudiantes aprendan sobre diseño de sistemas digitales y circuitos integrados específicos. Además, se busca evaluar cómo esta infraestructura afecta el desarrollo de habilidades y la motivación de los estudiantes, quienes se beneficiarán de la experiencia inmersiva del laboratorio. La infraestructura propuesta incluirá experimentos remotos que cubren áreas como procesamiento digital de señales y diseño de sistemas y circuitos integrados, utilizando un FPGA, periféricos, cámaras, realidad virtual y un servidor para la interconexión. Los estudiantes podrán interactuar con estos elementos de manera inmersiva en un entorno educativo. Se evaluará la eficacia del aprendizaje y la generación de conocimiento mediante la capacidad de inmersión, interacción y motivación proporcionada por el laboratorio remoto. El modelo de aceptación de tecnología medirá la intención de uso, mientras que el modelo de atención, relevancia, confianza y satisfacción evaluará la motivación de los estudiantes en un entorno de aprendizaje remoto. Las pruebas con equipos de realidad aumentada y simulaciones inmersivas servirán para examinar las condiciones de inmersión. Estos modelos ayudarán a validar la infraestructura como una herramienta educativa efectiva.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Citas

Biggs J. & Tang C. (2007), Teaching for quality learning at University: What the student does. McGrawHill.

Lamar D., Miaja P., Arias M., Rodriguez A., Rodriguez M., Vazquez A., Hernando M. & Sebastian J. (2012). Experiences in the application of project-based learning in a Switching-Mode Power Supplies Course, Education, IEEE Transactions, 55 (1), 69-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2011.2120612

Lei C., So H., Lam E., Wong K., Kwok R. & Chan C. (2012). Teaching introductory electrical engineering: Project-based learning experience, Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE), 2012 IEEE International Conference. H1B-1,H1B-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2012.6360320

Dormido R., Vargas H., Duro N., Sánchez J., Dormido Canto S., Farías G., Esquembre F., & Dormido, R. (2008). Development of a web-based control laboratory for automation technicians: The threetank system. IEEE Transactions on Education, 51(1), 35–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2007.893356

Yazidi A., Henao H., Capolino G., Betin F., & Filippetti, F. (2011). A web-based remote laboratory for monitoring and diagnosis of ac electrical machines. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 58(10), 4950- 4959. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2011.2109331

Arana-Arexolaleiba N., Markiegi-Gonzalez U., Oyarzun J. & Velez I. (2013). Adapting PBL instantiation to promote students’ engagement, 4th International Research Symposium on Problem-Based Learning (IRSPBL) 2013.

Grau, A. & Bolea, Y. (2008). Remote laboratory for control engineering degree. Proceedings of the 17th World Congress of The International Federation of Automatic Control, Seoul, Korea. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3182/20080706-5-KR-1001.02308

Besada-Portas, E., Lopez-Orozco, J., de la Torre, L., & de la Cruz, J. (2013). Remote control laboratory using EJS applets and twincat programmable logic controllers. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(2), 156–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2012.2204754

Besada-Portas E., Lopez-Orozco J.A., Aranda J. & de la Cruz J.M. (2013). Virtual and remote practices for learning control topics with a 3DOF quadrotor. 10th IFAC Symposium Advances in Control Education of the International Federation of Automatic Control, Sheffield, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3182/20130828-3-UK-2039.00024

Yuxin L. & Liu G. (2013). Design of remote 3D virtual laboratory for education on control system experimentation. 10th IFAC Symposium Advances in Control Education of The International Federation of Automatic Control Sheffield, UK

. Lerro F., Marchisio S., Martini S., Massacesi H., Perretta E., Gimenez A., Aimetti N., & Oshiro, J. (2012). Integration of an e-learning platform and a remote laboratory for the experimental training at distance in engineering education. Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV) 9th International Conference, 1 –5. doi: 10.1109/REV.2012.6293119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/REV.2012.6293119

Marín R., Sanz P. J., Nebot P., & Wirz R. (2005). A multimodal interface to control a robot arm via the web: A case study on remote programming. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 52(6) 1506-1520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2005.858733

Kaluz M., Orduña P., Garcıa-Zubia J., Fikar M. & Cirka L. (2013). Sharing control laboratories by remote laboratory management system WebLab-Deusto, 10th IFAC Symposium Advances in Control Education of The International Federation of Automatic Control, Sheffield, UK DOI: https://doi.org/10.3182/20130828-3-UK-2039.00074

Orduña P., García-Zubia J., Irurzun J., San Cristobal E., Martín S., Castro M., López-de Ia piña D., Hernández U., Angulo I., & González, J. (2009). Designing experiment agnostic remote laboratories. Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation

Richter T., Tetour Y., & Boehringer, D. (2011). Library of labs a european project on the dissemination of remote experiments and virtual laboratories. Multimedia (ISM) 2011 IEEE International Symposium, 543 –548. doi:10.1109/ISM.2011.96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISM.2011.96

Mougharbel I., El Hajj A., Artail H. & Riman C. (2006). Remote lab experiments models: A comparative study, Int. J. Engng Ed. 22(4), 849-857.

Del Alamo J. A., Chang V., Brooks L., McLean C., Hardison J., Mishuris G. & Hui L. (2003). MIT microelectronics WebLab. Lab on the Web Wiley-Interscience, 49-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/0471727709.ch2

Kirkwood A. & Price L. (2005). Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: what do we know about student’s attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses, Studies in Higher Education, 30(3), 257–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500095689

McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G. & Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC Model for Digital Practice. SSHRC Application, Knowledge Synthesis for the Digital Economy.

Mohammed A. R. (2014). Dominant Meaning Method for Intelligent Topic-Based Information Agent towards More Flexible MOOCs, Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications, 6(4),

Daradoumis T., Bassi R., Xhafa F. & Caballe S. (2013). A review on massive e-learning (MOOC) design, delivery and assessment, Eighth International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3PGCIC), Compiegne, France, 208- 213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/3PGCIC.2013.37

Clarke T. (2013). The advance of the MOOCs (massive open online courses): The impending globalisation of business education, Education + Training, 55(4), pp.403-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911311326036

Reinoso O., Jiménez L.M., Fernández de Avila S., Paya L., Gil A., Ubeda D. (2009). Experiencia en la integración de un laboratorio remoto de control para prácticas docentes a través de internet. e-ABC elearning sin límites. III Jornadas Internacionales UPM sobre innovación educativa y convergencia 2009.

Alamo J. D., Brooks L., McLean C., Hardison J., Mishuris G., Chang V. & Hui L. (2002). The MIT microelectronics WebLab: A web-enabled remote laboratory for microelectronic device characterization, Proc. of World Congress on Networked Learning in a Global Environment, Berlin, Germany.

San Cristobal E., Garcia-Zubia J., Orduna P., Castro M., Emaldi M., & Lopez-de Ipina D. (2012). Modelling remote laboratories integrations in e-learning tools through remote laboratories federation protocols, Proc. of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Seattle, USA.

Larrinaga F., Markiegi U., & Arenaza-Nuño I. (2014) MRLab: Laboratorios remotos sobre dispositivos reales para la experimentación, Conference: XI Congreso TAEE Tecnologías, Aprendizaje y Enseñanza de la Electrónica Bilbao (Spain)

Huang S., Wu K., Jeong H., Wang C. & Chen D., (2020). PyLog: An algorithm-centric python-based FPGA programming and synthesis flow. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.2021.3123465

Skhiri R., Fresse V., Jamont J., Suffran B., & Malek J. (2019). From FPGA to support cloud to cloud of FPGA: State of the Art, Hindawi International Journal of Reconfigurable Computing Volume 2019, Article ID 8085461, 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8085461

Aldahwan N. S. & Ramzan M. S. (2022). Descriptive Literature Review and Classification of Community Cloud Computing Research, Hindawi Scientific Programming, ID 8194140, 2-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8194140

Lima N., Viegas C. & García-Peñalvo F. J. (2019). Different didactical approaches using a remote Lab: Identification of impact factors, IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologías del Aprendizaje (IEEE RITA), 14(3), 76-86. doi: 10.1109/RITA.2019.2942256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2019.2942256

Vargas J., Cuero J. & Torres C. (2020). Laboratorios remotos e IOT una oportunidad para la formación en ciencias e ingeniería en tiempos del COVID19: Caso de Estudio en Ingeniería de Control, Revista espacios 41 (42), Especial COVID-19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.48082/espacios-a20v41n42p16

Orduña, P., Irurzun, J., Rodriguez-Gil, L., Garcia-Zubia, J., Gazzola, F., & López-de-Ipiña, D. (2011). Adding new features to new and existing remote experiments through their Integration in WebLabDeusto. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE), 7(S2), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v7iS2.1774 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v7iS2.1774

Garcia-Zubia J., Orduña P., Angulo I., Hernandez U., Dziabenko O., Lopez-Ipiña D. & Rodriguez-Gil L. (2011). Application and User Perceptions of Using the WebLab-Deusto-PLD in Technical Education, 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/GOLC.2011.6086780

Akerlind, T. (2018). Agile IT Infrastructure Transformation A Case Study of a Nordic Incumbent Telco, Business.

Thesinga T., Feldmanna C. & Burchardt M. (2021). Agile versus waterfall project management: decision model for selecting the appropriate approach to a project, Procedia Computer Science 181 (2021), 746–756. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.227

Brezočnik L. (2016). Comparison of agile methods: Scrum, Kanban, and Scrumban, Conference: Proceedings of the 19th International Multiconference Information Society - IS 2016: Collaboration, software and services in information society, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Guna Permana P. A. (2015). Scrum method implementation in a software development project management, (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 6(9). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2015.060927

Šimíčkováa J., Buganováa K. & Moškováa E. (2021). Specifics of the agile approach and methods in project management and its use in transport, transportation, Research Procedia 55 (2021) 1436–1443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.07.130

Mena Mamani N., García-Peñalvo F. J., Conde M. Á. & Gonçalves J. (2021). A systematic mapping about simulators and remote laboratories using hardware in the loop and robotic: Developing STEM/STEAM skills in pre-university education, Proceedings of the 2021 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE) IEEE, 2021. doi: 10.1109/SIIE53363.2021.9583622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIE53363.2021.9583622

Tavassolia S., Brandta M., Qiana M., Areniusa P. & Kianianb B. (2020). Adoption and Diffusion of Disruptive Technologies: The Case of Additive Manufacturing in Medical Technology Industry in Australia, Procedia Manufacturing 43 (2020), 18–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.103

Limpraptono F. Y., Nurcahyo E., Faisol A., Ajiza M., & Sunaryo D. K. (2020) Development Architecture of Remote Laboratory as Learning Solution in Industrial Revolution 4.0 Era, Journal of Industrial and Intelligent Information 8(2).

Rowe, R.J., Koban, L., Davidoff, A.J. et al. (2018). Efficacy of Online Laboratory Science Courses. J Form Des Learn 2(2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-017-0014-0 , 56–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-017-0014-0

Abriata L. A. (2022). How Technologies Assisted Science Learning at Home During the COVID-19 Pandemic, DNA AND CELL BIOLOGY 41(1), Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., 19–24 DOI: 10.1089/dna.2021.0497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.2021.0497

Herrero-Villareal D., Arguedas-Matarrita C. & Gutiérrez-Soto E. (2020) Remote laboratories: Educational resources for remote experimentation in times of pandemic from the students’ point of view, Revista de enseñanza de la física, 32 (2020), 181-189 ISSN 2451-6007

Lavayssière C., Larroque B. & Luthon F. (2022). Laborem Box: A scalable and open source platform to design remote lab experiments in electronics, HardwareX 11 (2022) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ohx.2022.e00301

Alzeer I. M. & Abushams M. F. (2021). Online Remote Smart Grid Lab, Design Engineering 8(2021) ISSN: 0011-9342, 15810- 15822

Reid D. P., Burridge J., Lowe D.B., & Drysdale T.D. (2022). Open-source remote laboratory experiments for controls engineering education, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education 1–21. DOI: 10.1177/03064190221081451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03064190221081451

Gunasekara M. A., Thathsara D., Maddumapatabandi K. & Gamage A. A. (2021). Remote Lab Activities in a Digital Age: Insights into Current Practices and Future Potentials, Journal of Education, Innovation, and Communication (JEICOM) 3(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.34097/jeicom3-1-june21-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34097/jeicom-3-1-june21-4

Trentsiosa P., Wolfa M. & Frerichb S. (2020). Remote Lab meets Virtual Reality – Enabling immersive access to high tech laboratories from afar, Procedia Manufacturing 43 (2020) 25–31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.104

Migue M. R. (2020). A Change in the 21st Century: Realizing the Effect of Replacing Actual Laboratories with Virtual Laboratories, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN: 2319- 7064 SJIF (2020): 7.803

Grout I. (2017). Remote Laboratories as a Means to Widen Participation in STEM Education, Educ. Sci. 2017, 7, 85; doi:10.3390/educsci7040085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7040085

Monzo C., Cobo G., Morán J.A., Santamaría E. & García-Solórzano D. (2021) Remote Laboratory for Online Engineering Education: The RLAB-UOC-FPGA Case Study. Electronics 2021, 10(1072). https://doi.org/10.3390/ electronics10091072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10091072

Feisel, L. & Rosa, A. (2005). The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 121-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x

Bohus C., Crowl L., Aktan B, & Shor M. (1996). Running Control Engineering Experiments Over the Internet. Proceedings of the IFAC World Congress, San Francisco, California, G(1196), 25-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)58121-5

Henry J. (2001), Web-Based Laboratories: Technical and Pedagogical Considerations, AIChE Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, 12-22.

Samuelsen D. & Graven H. (2016). Remote Laboratories in Engineering Education — an Overview of Implementation and Feasability. 14th LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education, and Technology: “Engineering Innovations for Global Sustainability”, 20-22 July 2016, San José, Costa Rica. http://dx.doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2016.1.1.050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2016.1.1.050

Migue M. (2020), A Change in the 21st Century: Realizing the Effect of Replacing Actual Laboratories with Virtual Laboratories, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) 10(10), 1198-1202. DOI: 10.21275/SR211021082037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21275/SR211021082037

Daud M. & Razali Z. (2016), UniMAP e-Lab for Electrical Engineering Technology: Future Online Laboratory Classes. MATEC Web of Conferences 7 01008 (2016). DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20167801008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20167801008

Alves G., Fidalgo A., Marques A. & Viegas C. (2016). Spreading remote lab usage A System – A Community – A Federation, International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CISPEE.2016.7777722

Chen X., Song G. & Zhang Y. (2010). Virtual and Remote Laboratory Development: A Review, Earth and Space 2010: Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments 2010 ASCE DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/41096(366)368

Heradio R. de la Torre L. & Dormido S. (2016). Virtual and remote labs in control education: A survey. Annual Reviews in Control 42, 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2016.08.001

Zubia J. & Alves G. (2011). Using Remote Labs in Education, University of Deusto - ISBN 978-84- 9830- 398-8

Stankovic S. (2016). Virtual Reality and Virtual Environments in 10 Lectures, 1st ed. London: Morgan & Claypool, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02254-8

Milgram P. & Kishino F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays, IEICE Transactions on Information Systems, E77-D(12), 1321–1329.

Furht B. (2011). Handbook of Augmented Reality. Springer, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0064-6

Tessier R. & Burleson W. (2001). Reconfigurable computing for digital signal processing: A survey. Journal of VLSI Signal Processing, 28(1):7–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008155020711

Ramirez-Cortes J., Gomez-Gil P., Alarcon-Aquino V., Martinez-Carballido J. & Morales-Flores E. (2013). FPGA-Based Educational Platform for Real-Time Image Processing Experiments. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Comput Appl Eng Educ 21: 193–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.20461

Njejimana L., Tétrault M. A., Arpin L., (2012). Design of a Real-time FPGA-based DAQ Architecture for the LabPET II, an APD.-based Scanner Dedicated to Small Animal PET Imaging. 2012 18th IEEE-NPSS Real Time Conference, pp. 1-5, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/RTC.2012.6418200

Reyes R., Oppus C. & Monje J. (2009). FPGA-based Digital Signal Processing Trainer, CSIE '09: Proceedings of the 2009 WRI World Congress on Computer Science and Information Engineering. 5(2009), 343–347. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSIE.2009.799 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CSIE.2009.799

Kyriakos A., Papatheofanous E., Bezaitis C. & Reisis D. (2022). Resources and Power Efficient FPGA Accelerators for Real-Time Image Classification. J. Imaging 2022, 8, 114. https:// doi.org/10.3390/jimaging804011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8040114

Fearghal Morgan, Seamus Cawley, and David Newell. 2012. Remote FPGA Lab for Enhancing Learning of Digital Systems. ACM Trans. Reconfigurable Technol. Syst. 5, 3, Article 18 (October 2012), 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2362374.2362382 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2362374.2362382

Leonardo Mesquita, Fabrício Cesar Gomes Filho, Marco Aurélio Alvarenga Monteiro. “FPGA-based Remote Laboratory for Digital Electronics”, International Journal of Development Research, 11, (04), 45870-45875.

.Medina-Vázquez, Agustín Santiago, Flores-Castillo, Pablo David, Bonilla-Barragán, Carlos Alberto, Gurrola-Navarro, Marco Antonio, Meda-Campana, María Elena, & Villegas-González, José Martín. (2019). Metodología de bajo costo para implementar circuitos electrónicos integrados, un ejemplo de aplicación. Ingeniería, investigación y tecnología, 20(3), e029. Epub 15 de octubre de 2019.https://doi.org/10.22201/fi.25940732e.2019.20n3.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/fi.25940732e.2019.20n3.029

.Magyari, A.; Chen, Y. FPGA Remote Laboratory Using IoT Approaches. Electronics 2021, 10, 2229. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10182229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10182229

.Parra Plaza, J. A., Farfán, A. & Becerra Peña, R. M. (2011). Diseño de circuitos VLSI a partir de VHDL. Recuperado de: http://hdl.handle.net/11349/21651.

.Ayodele, K.P., Akinwale, O.B., Kehinde, L.O., Osasona, O.O., Ajayi, E.O., & Akinwunmi, O.O. (2009). Advanced Digital Laboratory: An Fpga Based Remote Laboratory For Teaching Digital Electronics.